Monday, July 29, 2013

CNN: Has technology ruined handwriting?

(CNN) - Semi-ambidextrous Nicholas Cronquist rebelled against third-grade cursive lessons.
"I remember I hated it and I told my teacher I thought it was dumb," he says.
Cronquist, now 26, eventually learned to like using his left hand to inscribe strings of words. But typing papers while at the University of North Dakota and choosing a career rooted in technology drastically decreased the amount he wrote by hand, causing writing in cursive to become uncomfortable and painful.
So he switched to printing right-handed while still signing his name with the left.
"I don't even think I know how to write in cursive anymore," says Cronquist, who now lives and works in Laos.
Technology is constantly increasing communication speeds, often anticipating words before our brains can send signals to our fingers. But experts say handwriting is being sacrificed for the sake of technology's convenience. People like Cronquist say they communicate so much via laptops, phones and tablets that they rarely need to scribble a handwritten note.
This trend is reinforced by a 2012 study that found 33% of people had difficulty reading their own handwriting. Docmail, a UK-based printing and mailing company, conducted the study and concluded that one in three participants had not been required to produce something in handwriting for more than half a year. It also found that updating calendars, phone books and reminder notes was more likely to be completed without using a pen. Finally, more than half of participants said their handwriting was noticeably declining.
The state of handwriting in the United States, which celebrates National Handwriting Day every January 23 is not much better, says Wendy Carlson, a handwriting expert and forensic document examiner. Carlson works as an expert court witness, maintaining offices in Denver and Dallas. She says the dramatic decline of handwriting is causing "great" deterioration of the mind.
"Texting played a role in it because people are trying to write quick short sentences," she says. "People aren't using their minds and they are relying on technology to make the decisions for them."
Carlson says cursive writing combines mental and physical processes which involve both sides of the brain. She says she's noticed that the number of people who write cursive decreases as technology becomes the most dominant means of communication.
"If you are typing or texting, it's a matter of punching and finger-moving," she says. "You are doing very little thinking because you are not allowing your brain to form neural processes."
Jan Olsen is the founder and president of Handwriting Without Tears, a company that creates handwriting curriculum guides and workbooks for teachers and students from kindergarten through fifth grade. She says handwriting, especially cursive, is viewed as old-fashioned by some.
"The only reason to write anything is to retrieve it later," she said. "So you need to have it legible."
Cursive requirements in U.S. public schools have declined as access to technology increases. Alabama, California, Georgia, Idaho, Massachusetts and North Carolina require cursive and several other states are considering it.
The Washington Post reported in April that 45 states have adopted common core standards for education. Such standards are designed to provoke thought while at the same time preparing students to pass standardized tests, but they do not include a cursive learning requirement.
In other words, many kids today are growing up without having to learn the looping, elegant script that was demanded of their parents and grandparents.
Going forward, it will be up to individual states to decide whether to require cursive and then up to school districts to make it a focal part of the curriculum. Burdened by budget cuts, it is likely many states and districts will choose to have students type instead of write.
Olsen, 72, says the writing styles used in technology and handwriting conflict. Texts and instant messages require use of communication English, while writing requires use of standard English, she says. "To achieve in the world, people need to use standard (English)."
But the irony is that Olsen, who communicates via text message on her iPhone, says Handwriting Without Tears must be tech-savvy to remain competitive. In addition to its workbooks, the company offers an electronic teaching guide and an app.
"At work we have technology up the kazoo," she says.
Francis Smith, a bank officer living in Gibraltar, says that while technology allows instantaneous communication, he is nostalgic about handwriting due to its permanence and tangibility.
"If there is no electricity, none of (technology) will work," he says. "Notebooks have served us for a couple thousand years."
Smith, a former civil servant, used to write for work, but has spent the last 23 years typing on a PC. He says it has negatively impacted his handwriting to the point that people would never guess he won a handwriting contest when he was a child.
"It's a shame that now when you write quickly it looks like it's by someone who has not had an education," he says.
Smith, 52, says he's started using a fountain pen to try to improve his penmanship.
"It's got a lovely feel to it," he says. "It's not very practical."
Smith says he wants to recapture his ability to write cursive. Cronquist, however, is happy that printing allows him to write legibly.
"My right-handed printing is not too terrible," he says. "It's slow, but readable."

Monday, July 22, 2013

THE GUARDIAN: Cameron cracks down on 'corroding influence' of online pornography

Every household in Britain connected to the internet will be obliged to declare whether they want to maintain access to online pornography, David Cameron will announce on Monday.
In the most dramatic step by the government to crack down on the "corroding" influence of pornography on childhood, the prime minister will say that all internet users will be contacted by their service providers and given an "unavoidable choice" on whether to use filters.
The changes will be introduced by the end of next year. As a first step, customers who set up new broadband accounts or switch providers would have to actively disable the filters by the end of this year.
The moves will be announced by the prime minister in a speech to the NSPCC in which he will unveil a series of measures to reduce access to pornography with a particular focus on images of child sexual abuse. He will say:
• The possession of "extreme pornography", which includes scenes of simulated rape, is to be outlawed.
• The Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) is to draw up a blacklist of "abhorrent" internet search terms to identify and prevent pedophiles searching for illegal material.
• All police forces will work with a single secure database of illegal images of children to help "close the net on paedophiles".
In a separate move, Twitter is to introduce a tagging system to prevent such images being posted on its service. There are now millions of pictures posted among the 2 billion tweets every five days. The intention is to introduce the system, which uses a Microsoft-developed industry standard called PhotoDNA, this year if possible.
The prime minister's speech is designed to answer critics who accuse him of talking tough but failing to take action. In the most significant step he will outline detailed plans to limit access to pornography.
The Daily Mail, which has been running a campaign to crack down on pornography online, reported that the prime minister will say: "By the end of this year, when someone sets up a new broadband account the settings to install family-friendly filters will be automatically selected. If you just click 'next' or 'enter', then the filters are automatically on.
"And, in a really big step forward, all the ISPs have rewired their technology so that once your filters are installed, they will cover any device connected to your home internet account. No more hassle of downloading filters for every device, just one-click protection. One click to protect your whole home and keep your children safe.
"Once those filters are installed, it should not be the case that technically literate children can just flick the filters off at the click of a mouse without anyone knowing. So we have agreed with industry that those filters can only be changed by the account holder, who has to be an adult. So an adult has to be engaged in the decisions."
The prime minister will also announce that possession of "extreme pornography", which includes scenes of simulated rape, will be outlawed by the government. It is illegal to publish such pornography and illegal to possess it in Scotland but not in England and Wales.
Cameron will say: "There are certain types of pornography that can only be described as 'extreme' … that is violent, and that depicts simulated rape. These images normalize sexual violence against women – and they are quite simply poisonous to the young people who see them."
The Rape Crisis group welcomed the announcement by the prime minister, who will also say that the government is to legislate to ensure that videos streamed online are subject to the same rules as those sold in shops. Fiona Elvines, of Rape Crisis South London, said: "We are heartened by the government's announcement that it will close the loophole in existing extreme pornography legislation.
"The government today has made a significant step forward in preventing rapists using rape pornography to legitimize and strategise their crimes and, more broadly, in challenging the eroticisation of violence against women and girls."
In some of his toughest language against the world's largest internet providers, the prime minister will warn them they face a duty to block "sick" people searching for illegal sites online. "I have a very clear message for Google, Bing, Yahoo and the rest. You have a duty to act on this – and it is a moral duty. If there are technical obstacles to acting on [search engines], don't just stand by and say nothing can be done; use your great brains to help overcome them.
"You're the people who have worked out how to map almost every inch of the Earth from space; who have developed algorithms that make sense of vast quantities of information. Set your greatest brains to work on this. You are not separate from our society, you are part of our society, and you must play a responsible role in it."
The move by Twitter to introduce a new tagging system, revealed exclusively to the Guardian, has come independently of UK pressure.

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

ST: Sleepless in Singapore

[EDITORIAL] - Many Singaporeans are not getting enough sleep and they are generally unaware of the serious ill-effects of the poor habit. One in three people are getting so little sleep it is affecting their health, according to a recent editorial in the Annals, a journal by the Singapore Academy of Medicine.
A Straits Times street poll of 140 people found that most of them were ignorant of the finding that insufficient sleep can lead to obesity, diabetes and heart diseases. Experts have also pointed out that long-term sleep deprivation can cause damage to memory and cognitive functions.
It is easy to blame the problem on the long hours at work. But lack of sleep causes poor concentration, which leads to a vicious cycle of spending more time on a task and hence working longer hours. The lack of concentration also increases the risk of transport and industrial accidents by one and a half to two times, according to the Annals.
Corporate managers should set an example by not staying late in the office when there is no need to. They should let their staff know that working long hours in the office does not make them better workers. Instead, it might indicate that they may not be as organized in their work as they should.
Many people also stay up late into the night to engage in social media. They have developed a habit of checking Facebook, Twitter and e-mail and surfing the Net. This is especially so amongst the young. Parents should set a curfew on their children and be strict about it for their own good.
The Ministry of Education has given schools the leeway to start their morning lessons at eight, instead of 7.30 am. Many schools are not taking advantage of this, but keeping up old practices which require students to rise at the crack of dawn. The Health Promotion Board should launch a concerted educational campaign to promote awareness of the long-term ill-effects of insufficient sleep.

CNN: George Zimmerman found not guilty in the death of Trayvon Martin

George Zimmerman found not guilty
(CNN) - George Zimmerman never denied shooting Trayvon Martin, but he said he did so in self defense. Late Saturday night, a Florida jury found him not guilty in the teenager's death.
The verdict caps a case that has inflamed passions for well over a year, much of it focused on race.
The six jurors -- all of them women -- deliberated for 16½ hours. Five of the women are white; one is a minority.
When he heard his fate, Zimmerman had little visible reaction. He turned and shook the hand of one of his attorneys before sitting back down, smiling only after court was adjourned.
Martin's parents, Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fulton, were not in the courtroom when the decision was announced. But they shared their emotions on Twitter shortly afterward.
"Even though I am broken hearted my faith is unshattered I WILL ALWAYS LOVE MY BABY TRAY," Tracy Martin tweeted.
Martin's dad: My heart is broken
Zimmerman's brother, Robert Zimmerman Jr., said words can't express how relieved his family is.
"Having said that, I don't think this is a time for high-fiving," the brother said. "I acknowledge -- we all have acknowledged -- that Mr. Martin, Trayvon Martin, lost his life. (But) it was not an act of murder. It was not an act of manslaughter."
The decision
The jury had three choices: to find Zimmerman guilty of second-degree murder; to find him guilty of a lesser charge of manslaughter; or to find him not guilty.
For second-degree murder, the jurors would have had to believe that Martin's unlawful killing was "done from ill will, hatred, spite or an evil intent" and would be "of such a nature that the act itself indicates an indifference to human life."
What led jurors to this verdict?
To convict Zimmerman of manslaughter, the jurors would have had to believe he "intentionally committed an act or acts that caused the death of Trayvon Martin." That charge could have carried a sentence of up to 30 years in prison, though the jury was not told of that possible sentence.
Ultimately, they believed Zimmerman wasn't guilty of either charge. None of the jurors wanted to speak to the media after the verdict.
A call for calm
Both sides of the case asked for peace after the verdict. In the immediate aftermath, they appeared to have gotten their wish -- even though the Internet erupted with outrage.
But now that Zimmerman is a free man, his defense and his brother fear for his safety.
"He has to be very cautious and protective of his safety because there is still a fringe element who have said, at least in tweets and everything else, that they want revenge -- that they will not listen to a verdict of not guilty," defense attorney Mark O'Mara said. 
Robert Zimmerman Jr. said his brother "is going to be looking around his shoulder for the rest of his life."
When asked if George Zimmerman will keep the gun he used to shoot Trayvon Martin, his brother said he has good reason to.
"I think he has more reason now than ever to think that people are trying to kill him because they express they're trying to kill him, all the time, every day, on my Twitter feed, on the Internet," Robert Zimmerman told CNN's Piers Morgan.
"He has always feared for his safety."
But Crump said everyone should stay calm, especially for Martin's sake.
"For Trayvon to rest in peace, we must all be peaceful."
The race debate
The trial may be over, but the race debate surrounding the case rages on.
"The whole world was looking at this case for a reason ... We'd be intellectually dishonest if we didn't acknowledge the racial undertones in this case," Martin family attorney Benjamin Crump said. "So we have to have very responsible conversations about how we get better as a country and move forward from this tragedy and learn from it."
Prosecutor Angela Corey said Martin was unfairly viewed as a criminal before he was shot.
Analysis: The role that race played
Amid the national debate about whether Zimmerman racially profiled Martin, defense attorney O'Mara suggested his client was actually profiled by critics.
"I think things would have been different if George Zimmerman were black for this reason: He never would have been charged with a crime," O'Mara said.
He said the country "absolutely" needs to have a conversation about whether young black males are treated differently in the criminal justice system -- but said that conversation is a separate topic from what happened the night Zimmerman and Martin met.
Sports stars sound off on verdict
Martin family attorney Natalie Jackson commended the millions of people who signed an online petition "not in an effort to persecute George Zimmerman, but in an effort to say a black 17-year-old child should be able to walk home from the store and not be shot."
She said their efforts were not in vain.
"I don't want them to be discouraged because I think they may have saved the life of another child," Jackson said. "I think that from now on, if there is someone who wants to follow someone with a gun, I think they'll think twice about it."
The fateful night
The deadly encounter took place on February 26, 2012, as Martin walked back to his father's fiancee's house through the rain from a Sanford convenience store. The 17-year-old was carrying Skittles and a drink.
Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer, spotted him and called police.
A 911 dispatcher told Zimmerman that officers were on the way and not to follow the allegedly suspicious person. But Zimmerman still got out of his car, later telling police he just wanted to get a definitive address to relay to authorities.
Sometime after that, Zimmerman and Martin got into a physical altercation. Questions later arose about who was the aggressor, about whether Martin may have seen or reached for Zimmerman's gun, and about whether Zimmerman should have had more injuries if he was pummeled, as he claims.
Prosecutors never accused Zimmerman, who identifies himself as Hispanic, of being racist. But they did argue that he wrongly and spitefully prejudged Martin as one of those "f***ing punks," as he's heard saying under his breath in his call to police.
"The defendant didn't shoot Trayvon Martin because he had to," Assistant State Attorney John Guy said. "He shot him because he wanted to. That's the bottom line."
The defense contended that Martin jumped out of some bushes and pounced on Zimmerman as he was walking back toward his car that night, then punched him and slammed his head repeatedly into the concrete sidewalk.
Zimmerman's account of what happened the night of the shooting was a central part of the trial. He was the only living person who witnessed the entire incident, and there wasn't much physical evidence for either team to fall back on.
What's next?
The NAACP has called for the Justice Department to file civil rights charges against Zimmerman and urged the public to sign a petition to support the effort.
"The most fundamental of civil rights -- the right to life -- was violated the night George Zimmerman stalked and then took the life of Trayvon Martin," the advocacy group said in a statement.
O'Mara said if anyone tries to sue Zimmerman, "we will seek and we will get civil immunity in a civil hearing. And we will see just how many civil lawsuits have spawned from this fiasco."
But for now, both families will reflect and try to move forward.
"Trayvon Martin will forever remain in the annals of history next to Medgar Evers and Emmett Till as symbols for the fight for equal justice for all," Crump said.
When asked what he has to say to Trayvon Martin's parents, Robert Zimmerman Jr. said he understands their pain.
"There are no winners. They will not win or lose anything more than they already have lost, which is their son's life, by any kind of verdict for George," Robert Zimmerman said. "I applaud them for asking for the verdict to be respected. ... And I will pray for them."

Saturday, July 13, 2013

Memories.

       "Memories warm you up from the inside. But they also tear you apart." is a quote by Haruki Murakami. In life, you are inevitably going to experience a series of both good and bad times. With these successes and hardships come an abundance of great and awful memories, some that you wish to cherish forever and some that you wish were erased from your mind instantly. But what actually determines whether you have a good or bad memory? It's the choices that you make, the attitude that you show towards the situation and whether you learn any lessons from these memories.
       Firstly, good memories. These are the best kind of memories, any person's most prized possession. These memories can come from things like simple family dinners to vacations in the most picturesque tropical island on Earth. Just the slightest thought of them is able to bring a warm, tingling sensation to your heart and has a calming effect on your mind. For myself, one of my greatest memories would be the get-togethers my family, close relatives and a few close friends never fail to have. Nothing beats the feeling of the joy and laughter you get from hanging out with your relatives, especially in my tight-knit family. Whether it's the festive season, a birthday or a wedding, my family is always together. This gives me the chance to spend quality time with my relatives and cousins. It's through these moments that new memories are created, and these memories will remind you that your family will be right by your side as you go through thick and thin. With family being your main source of safety and support, you ought to keep family as your first priority at all times. These good memories are the ones you wish to keep close to your heart forever, whether in the form of photographs or just in thought.
       Secondly, bad memories. They come from bad experiences, from disagreements to disappointments. They intend to break you down, crumble you to pieces and haunt you in your nightmares. But guess what? It is ultimately your choice to whether you would allow yourself to be dragged into the dark world of regret, or free yourself by moving on with life. This is the only way you can turn a bad memory into a valuable life lesson, which you will continue to look back on for years.
       So, what can we take away from this? Memories give you the opportunity to change negativity into positivity, to turn your frowns upside down. But this decision depends on you, the individual. Are you going to make the best out of life?

"Children born into rich families have less stress than those who come from less well to do families." What are your views?

       Let's be honest here. Everyone's dream would be to have the fame and the fortune. We would all want to be rich and drink wine from a golden cup. But back to reality, everywhere you go in the world you will interact and meet with people from all walks of life, they could be either wealthy or poor. That brings us to the question, do children born into rich families have less stress than those who come from less well to do families? Yes, I believe they do. I will be writing on how much money a person has can affect his or her's education, health and social status in school.
       Firstly, we shall begin with the topic of education. Children who are born into rich families will have a much higher chance of experiencing a better education. Their families will be able to afford to have private tutors for their child, which will most definitely benefit the child as he will receive extra support in his studies. These students will also be able to afford to be enrolled into private schools which have more expensive school fees and are known to have a better standard of education compared to neighborhood schools. They will also be able to complete their tertiary education abroad as their parents can afford the fees which can add up to tens of thousands of dollars. On the other hand, children from less well to do families are not as fortunate to experience this high level of education as they would not be able to afford it. Although some may argue that students from less well to do families can appeal for the government to handle these education fees. However, how can one expect the government to pay for so many students that are from less well to do families, especially when some countries have an extremely high population. Therefore, I say that students from less well to do families will not experience the high standard of education students from rich families will have the chance to go through.
       Secondly, on how students from rich families get more medical benefits than those from less well to do families. Students born into rich families are able to afford to be treated by specialists in private hospitals, while those from less well to do families are not as fortunate and go to public hospitals. Let's say your child has contracted dengue, those children from rich families will be able to obtain a more luxurious ward as they can afford it, but those from less well to do families will be admitted to lower quality wards, or they may even choose not to go to the hospital for treatment due to the high costs. Although it is highly debatable that in countries like Singapore, those from less well to do families get subsidies from the government for their medical fees. However, these students will still not get the same quality of treatment as those born into rich families. Therefore, I say that students from rich families will experience a higher form of medical treatment than those from less well to do families.
       Lastly, I feel that the students' financial background will have an impact on their social status in school. Those from less well to do families may get picked on by the students from rich families for not being able to afford branded and expensive school bags or shoes. This may actually affect the students' performance in school as they may get bullied. For instance, a student with an expensive mobile phone will be deemed as 'cool' by his peers but the student without a mobile phone will be known to be 'lame', they will then get made fun of by their peers. Therefore, the students' financial background has an effect on his social status and performance in school.
       In conclusion, I believe that students from less well to do families will be under more stress and pressure than those born into rich families because of the level of education they will receive, the medical benefits and status among your peers in school. How would you feel if your child isn't as fortunate as others?